Skip to main content
DayTrellis

Library / Focus & cognitive strategies

ADHD organization skills for kids: what helps

Reviewed by the founder before publishing. Not reviewed by a clinician.

ADHD organization skills for kids improved with training in trials. Children and teens with ADHD who took part in organizational skills training were rated as more organized by both parents and teachers, though grades improved less (Bikic, 2017). And in one long study, how well children with ADHD kept track of homework materials predicted their teen grades (Langberg, 2011).

Does organizational skills training help kids with ADHD?

The clearest answer comes from Bikic, 2017, which pooled the results of 12 trials in which children and teens were randomly assigned to organizational skills training or to a comparison group. Everyone in them had been diagnosed with ADHD, and the trials were open to ages 5 to 18, with children from elementary, middle and high school grades. The comparison groups got parent education, their usual care, community care or a place on a waitlist. Parents weren't bystanders: they took an active part in the training.

Here's what changed. Children who got the training were rated as better organized than the comparison groups, by teachers and, even more so, by parents. Parents also rated their attention as better, by a moderate amount. Teachers saw smaller gains in attention, and schoolwork and grades improved too, but only by a small amount. Where trials checked back one to six months later, the gains seemed to hold, at least in the short term.

There are honest limits here. Parents and teachers knew which children had the training, and parents were part of it, so their ratings may lean hopeful. The trials measured organization in different ways, with no agreed standard. And some signs of inattention overlap with being disorganized, so it's hard to tell which one really changed.

Even so, the authors concluded that this training helps children and teens with ADHD who struggle with organization, and could be one part of wider care. If you want the background on the planning and tracking skills involved, executive function and ADHD explains it.

Keep in mind what was tested: training given as part of a trial. A routine you set up on your own isn't the same as that training.

Why does school organization matter over the years?

School struggles linked to ADHD can last for years. Arnold, 2015 reviewed 176 studies that followed people with ADHD for at least two years. In people with ADHD who weren't getting any treatment, long-term school results were usually worse than in people without ADHD. That held for both test scores and everyday performance like grades, and it still held when the authors allowed for differences in IQ. The studies varied a lot in design and in who took part, so the authors kept their conclusions general. They also couldn't separate the effects of ADHD from those of other conditions a child might have.

So where does organization come in? Langberg, 2011 started with 579 children diagnosed with the combined type of ADHD in early grade school and followed them into their mid to late teens. The researchers looked at what in childhood best predicted teen grades. Three things stood out: how well children managed their homework materials, as rated by parents; how they did in class, as rated by teachers; and how much schooling their parents had.

Two details matter for parents. First, how well children managed their homework materials, as their parents rated it, helped explain the link between childhood inattention and later grades in math, history and overall grade average. Simply finishing homework didn't carry that link in the same way. Second, what predicted grades wasn't the same as what predicted test scores.

This study watched and recorded; it didn't assign anyone to build these skills. That means organization was linked with later grades, which isn't proof that it caused them. All the children had one type of ADHD, and most had taken part in an intensive 14-month program early on, so the results may not apply to every child.

Building ADHD organization skills for kids at home

What can you do with this? Start with what the research supports, and be clear about what it doesn't.

The training that helped was studied in trials with children and teens diagnosed with ADHD. A chart on the fridge or a nightly bag check isn't that training, and nobody should promise it'll do the same. An unanswered question isn't a settled no.

The long study points to a useful target. Langberg's team encouraged clinicians who assess children for ADHD to check how well they manage homework and how they're doing in class, and to make those goals in a care plan when there's a problem. You can raise both with your child's doctor. Ask whether managing homework materials could be a goal in their care.

The same authors noted that help aimed at grades may not lift test scores, and the reverse. In the teen years, if better grades are the goal, they suggested working on grades directly, along with what feeds into them, like homework management. So it's worth picking the goal you care about and watching that one.

Organization is one piece of a bigger picture. For a wider look at what has been studied for attention, see what helps ADHD focus.

Try this today: Write down one question for your child's next doctor visit: how are they managing homework materials, and could that be a goal in their care?

The evidence has clear limits. In the training trials, parents and teachers knew which children took part, so their ratings may lean hopeful. The long study followed children with one type of ADHD, most of whom had been in an intensive program early on. Only a clinician can diagnose ADHD or advise on your child's own situation.

The numbers Stats and what the terms mean

The statistics behind the plain-language claims above.

  • Bikic, 2017: improvement in organizational skills as rated by teachers, compared with the comparison groups, g = 0.54.
  • Bikic, 2017: improvement in organizational skills as rated by parents, g = 0.83.
  • Bikic, 2017: improvement in inattention as rated by parents, g = 0.56.
  • Bikic, 2017: improvement in grade point average, g = 0.29.
  • Arnold, 2015: share of long-term outcomes that were worse in people with untreated ADHD than in people without ADHD, 79% of achievement test outcomes and 75% of academic performance outcomes.

What the terms mean:

  • Effect size (g) is a number that shows how big a difference is, separate from whether it was statistically significant; here it compares children who got the training with those in the comparison groups. Roughly, 0.2 is small, 0.5 is moderate and 0.8 is large.

Related reads

Want strategies matched to your day?

The 5-minute quiz builds a personalized five-pillar daily plan. Free, no card, and your results describe a profile, not a diagnosis.

Take the 5-minute quiz

Sources

  1. Bikic A, Reichow B, McCauley S, Ibrahim K, Sukhodolsky D. "Meta-analysis of organizational skills interventions for children and adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder." Clinical Psychology Review, 2017 · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.12.004
  2. Arnold L, Hodgkins P, Kahle J, Madhoo M, Kewley G. "Long-Term Outcomes of ADHD: Academic Achievement and Performance." Journal of Attention Disorders, 2015 · doi:10.1177/1087054714566076
  3. Langberg J, Molina B, Arnold L, Epstein J, Altaye M, Hinshaw S. "Patterns and Predictors of Adolescent Academic Achievement and Performance in a Sample of Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder." Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 2011 · doi:10.1080/15374416.2011.581620

Wellness & education only. Not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Talk to a licensed clinician about what applies to you.